7.7.11

isabella calthorpe

images Isabella Calthorpe isabella calthorpe. Gemma and Isabella took part
  • Gemma and Isabella took part



  • return_to_india
    04-28 11:28 AM
    http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/apr2009/db20090423_219068.htm

    But advocates for skilled immigrants�many of whom remain stuck for years on H-1Bs waiting in the long queue for permanent residency�worry that the bill is a political maneuver rather than an earnest effort at reform. Aman Kapoor, president of the skilled immigrant advocate group Immigration Voice, says that a more effective bill would ensure H-1B visa workers are on a level playing field with U.S. workers. "Skilled immigrants on H-1Bs don't get the same rights and protections as everyone else," says Kapoor. "So wouldn't the solution be to empower and enable the skilled immigrants on H-1Bs such that�skilled immigrants on H-1s have adequate protections so that no one can take advantage of [them]? But no one wants to talk about protections for skilled immigrants."

    Employers don't want H1Bs that flexible ( or want be invisibly bonded. )
    in fear of bargaining and jumping the ship.





    wallpaper Gemma and Isabella took part isabella calthorpe. Isabella Calthorpe
  • Isabella Calthorpe



  • bach007
    07-25 11:03 PM
    u can keep renewing your H-1 as long as your 485 has been pending for more then 180 days.(someone corect me if i am wrong).Once u get ure recipt number ure status changes to "485 pending" and can be on h-1 as long as ure GC is approved.No matter when u get married your wife will not be out of status-so its a good decision that u applied.


    Hi Priti, thanks for the reply. However my fear is that what you say is not true. I am on my 7th yr extension of H1B and my lawyer has told me that once I apply for 485, I can NOT keep renewing my H1B. That is why he insisted on applying for AP.

    Is this information correct? Can someone PLEASE clarify??? :confused:





    isabella calthorpe. Yates Isabella Calthorpe
  • Yates Isabella Calthorpe



  • mallu
    10-11 11:31 PM
    Namechecks:

    IV will be soon posting some updates on this. We have done some ground work on this issue in the recent past and have got positive response. Stronger support from our members, will definitely help us push this agenda item. IV feels that this issue is going to be a big roadblock for a lot of us now, after people have filed their I485s. It is possible to get a much wider bi-partisan support on this issue by us and we are already pursuing it.

    Pls. stay tuned on this issue.

    Good.
    The govt. had announced something : http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/pr_1186757867585.shtm
    See item (22) .

    May be ask Mr.Chertoff , "Sir, what is the status on your annoucement".





    2011 Isabella Calthorpe isabella calthorpe. Yates Isabella Calthorpe
  • Yates Isabella Calthorpe



  • walking_dude
    12-03 05:29 PM
    Contrary to what most believe - Contributing is the easiest thing to do. Send some money and forget about it. And the most effective one too. Lobbying is IVs greatest tool to make changes in the legal system. If you still don't get it, you cannot get any law passed in Washington without lobbying. Whatever we do on the side is to help that effort.

    Volunteering is much more tougher. By volunteering I don't mean giving the next Brightest Unworkable idea or the daily-dose of rants on an online forum. Volunteering in my world (real one) means sacrificing personal time (with family) for the greater good of a community.

    Calling members, planning & conducting meetings, telecons, write letters to lawmakers and meet them, put IV booths in local events. In short, it's a thankless job. At the end of the day you're more hated than loved (ask Chandu)!

    IMO Volunteering and contribution are not separate. It's member buy-in. Either you agree to a principle or you don't. If you agree, you'll contribute as well as volunteer (when you can). If you don't agree, you don't.



    more...


    isabella calthorpe. Isabella Calthorpe Meets
  • Isabella Calthorpe Meets



  • mallu
    03-13 02:19 PM
    I was wondering how many are in the pipeline with PD up to Nov.2003 ?





    isabella calthorpe. Actress Isabella Calthorpe:
  • Actress Isabella Calthorpe:



  • cbadari99
    08-14 05:18 PM
    Completely agree with you.



    more...


    isabella calthorpe. Isabella Calthorpe
  • Isabella Calthorpe



  • santb1975
    06-02 12:07 PM
    Please make your calls. This is for everyone. Please take the poll after you called. Thx

    Since all the reps are from California, Is this only for California members?

    If not, let me know and I will get on the horn as soon as I can (probably not possible today, maybe tomorrow).





    2010 Yates Isabella Calthorpe isabella calthorpe. Isabella Calthorpe
  • Isabella Calthorpe



  • GCneeded
    06-07 02:09 PM
    Immigration is a privilege when we enter the country. But when we have been here for such a long time, paid our taxes and respected the administration and bureaucracy, it�s our right. As for the job loss, no job is certain for anyone. But at least a GC holder can look for alternate jobs. He is not tied to his labor cert/employer. When employees post for job, they might say �need a citizen or gc holder�. But never say we only need a H1-B holder. So when we have respected and followed the rules of this country immigration becomes a right as logic life suggested.

    My 2 cents�



    more...


    isabella calthorpe. Actress Isabella Calthorpe:
  • Actress Isabella Calthorpe:



  • willwin
    06-13 09:17 AM
    you are asking for EB2 guys in 2004,2005,2006,2007 to wait for EB-3 guys in 2001,2002,2003,2004. Point is well taken. Its a humane way of handling things.

    Perhaps they should not make EB1 current, let them wait a year or two while 2004 EB2 and 2001 EB3 get their green cards.

    Ask this question to yourself. If you were an EB2 person with 2004 priority with a spouse and kid, Would you be willing to wait few more years to get your green cards so that a 2001 EB-3 shall get his faster and may not care /appreciate your sacrifice?

    Your position helps yourself and nobody else. I dont have any problems 2001 EB3s getting approved before 2004 EB2's. Thats the way it should be, but not at the expense of EB2's. Feeling of entitlement is not adequate justification. USCIS has established a way to convert to EB2 status, if you have sufficient experience. You can certainly try that option.

    I just spoke my mind, dont care if i get red dots or not. Apperantly people here are way too sensitive to an opposite point of view.

    Texanguy,

    I am in EB3 (I) with a PD of 2005.

    I agree that EB3 or for that matter any category should not benefit at the cost of another. But, when it comes to spill over, I personally feel that the numbers should be equally distributed among all retrogrossed countries and categories.

    If there are 20,000 numbers that DOS thinks will not be used in the current FY; then let it distribute equally to all categories. Say if EB2 and EB3 (I) or China gets 5000 each, then obviosuly, because of a shorter queue EB2 dates would move forward beyond EB3 does. I think this is fair.

    Whether a humane approach or a logic approach, it does not make sense for a EB3 (or any category) to wait for 7 years!!!

    BTW, I turned you green. Be happy :-)





    hair Yates Isabella Calthorpe isabella calthorpe. Isabella Calthorpe gt; Photos
  • Isabella Calthorpe gt; Photos



  • nk2006
    07-12 11:50 AM
    Friends,

    There is a rumor going around now. One of my colleagues here claims that he got a call from his attorney that there is going to be a new bulletin for july, released either tomorrow or on Monday. Can someone talk to their attorney and confirm this?

    I'm unable to reach my attorney now.
    Nobody knows anything - this is just a rumor for now. Though I love to see it be true, I dont think it will happen. Re-reversing the visa bulletin will get more attention than the original reversing and USCIS might try to avoid that. But after JULY 2nd I wont get surprised with anything now (regarding visa bulletins and USCIS's stupidity).



    more...


    isabella calthorpe. Isabella Calthorpe - Shrek
  • Isabella Calthorpe - Shrek



  • akv123
    07-14 11:29 PM
    I plan to send this petition to all senior executives of Time Warner Inc by Priority Mail and Fax. CNN is a fully owned subsidiary of Time Warner Inc.

    http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/loudobbs


    Done.





    hot Isabella Calthorpe Meets isabella calthorpe. Isabella Calthorpe hot photo,
  • Isabella Calthorpe hot photo,



  • chanduv23
    01-30 09:52 AM
    Though most people here would want retroactive action, I think such a rule will only be applicable for applicants based on a cut off date that will be a future date.

    Thats how all laws have been in past.

    This is something that is most unwelcome by employers and lawyers and thats why this may have opposition. Especially those consulting companies that thrive on these things.



    more...


    house ISABELLA isabella calthorpe. Isabella Calthorpe,
  • Isabella Calthorpe,



  • mdforgc
    04-09 06:38 PM
    I just ocntributed 200 dollars towards the goal of 150K, we will get there. And great work IV core, keep it up.





    tattoo Actress Isabella Calthorpe: isabella calthorpe. and Isabella Calthorpe
  • and Isabella Calthorpe



  • GCHPLC
    11-06 06:51 AM
    No LUD since Aug.2006 on I-485 . Who can beat me on this.

    No LUD since April 2005, how about that?



    more...


    pictures Isabella Calthorpe isabella calthorpe. quot;13 Hrsquot; Isabella Calthorpe
  • quot;13 Hrsquot; Isabella Calthorpe



  • vina92
    02-07 02:43 PM
    This is a great point. Even if we get one time relief,that should suffice because retro might not happen in the future as there will not be 245si/195kH1bs. I hope one of the core group members might want to look at this. This will atleast counteract the exaggerated and bloated immigration numbers by the antiimmigrant groups.


    It is just speculation that it will take 10 years or 15 years. Actually past 3 years atleast 50% h1 were used by TCS,WIPRO and similar companies. So those who are processing gc is less. But it may take some time to clear current backlog as we had 195k H1 cap till 2003. If 65k h1 cap is there then it will be 3 year waiting period for EB2 and 4 to 5 year for Eb3. People will speculate based on number of H1s. But their calculation is not including the number of people who are giving up and also many people are going back. But if they increase H1 then the situation may become worse. I think one time releif will be enough to resolve the issue for
    next 5 years. But Skil bill is asking too much(May be for permanent resolution of
    gc issue) and opposition is more as anti immigrants are quoting the numbers. Remember in 2000 the relief of recapturing previous few years did not attract
    large opposition and passed easily. Simlarly if H1 increase also limited for 2 or 3 years that can be passed easily as we can convince Senators like Sessions.
    But if we keep on asking so many numbers of H1 and Gc and also exemptions
    for Master degree then we have to wait for CIR as this will have lesser impact
    in numbers compared to illegal immigrants.





    dresses Isabella Calthorpe hot photo, isabella calthorpe. his wife Lady Natasha
  • his wife Lady Natasha



  • eager_immi
    02-14 07:43 AM
    Listen we are giving our hard earned money to this group, we beleive that they are the only ones fighting our cause. Can you please name one more org/group that is doing the same. The industry that includes esteemed Bill Gates wants more H1bs, no on talks about our releief. What open mind are you talking about? Get a reality check. We are not a frat house here that we are applauding each other. We want constructive criticism... e.g. if you think you are a better leader step up and say you can do x, y, z.

    If you cannot give contructive critisim then the rest of us would appreciate that you don't vent ur frustrations here, because see how much harm you do by making us respond to your personal frustrations.


    I realize that there is no point in telling you guys anything. When you don't have an open mind, you can not accept the facts. It's like banging your heads against steel wall. When you are not even ready to diagnose the disease, there is little hope you will be able to cure it. Denial is a beautiful thing.

    So I apologize for my comments.

    Here is something you will love:
    Congratulations IV and the core team! Keep up the good work.



    more...


    makeup Actress Isabella Calthorpe: isabella calthorpe. ISABELLA
  • ISABELLA



  • a1b2c3
    04-30 01:13 PM
    My wait time is as long as yours, so I am not thinking about getting ready for citizenship just yet (lot can happen in 5 years). If the USCIS processing times are to be believed, they are supposed to take between 12 and 15 months to decide on a currently filed application (the server seems to be down now, so couldn't verify the latest status). There may be additional time differences depending on where you are located. And knowing how USCIS operates, backlogs are not unheard of (http://www.immigrationpolicy.org/images/File/factcheck/CitizenshipDayFactSheet09-16-08.pdf).

    Here is a comforting thought - and someone correct me if I am wrong - but unlike the hectic GC process with all the "inequalities" among various EB categories, naturalization process is a level-playing field where your specific skills do not matter. Everyone is considered equal here, whether you have got your GC via EB, FB or even amnesty route. This makes sense too, considering that your value (to this country) as a citizen rests primarily in your voting right, and someone who can cook is just as good to vote as another who writes smart computer codes (no knock on the cook, my wife is a fantastic cook herself). This is why the "priority date" for your citizenship application is set at 5 years (of continuous residency) from the date printed on your PR card, irrespective of your GC category (the wait is 3 years for those with USC spouse). The only condition that permits some arbitrariness in the evaluation process is in establishing a "good moral character", which makes point #6 in my original list important.

    This is of 01/09. It takes about 6 months after N-400 is filed and you can apply after 4 years and 9 months.
    http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/M-476.pdf
    Yes, there will be backlogs but most likely there won't be long waiting lines. It really depends on the number of people filing. There won't be another July 2007.





    girlfriend and Isabella Calthorpe isabella calthorpe. isabella calthorpe,
  • isabella calthorpe,



  • rb_248
    04-27 11:16 PM
    Back in the days there was a campaign launched by Govt of India to plant more trees.....the slogan was "plant one tree for every house". A wise guy was prompt to ask the govt... "give me a house, I will plant a tree". Likewise, give me the GC, I will definitely follow the rules.





    hairstyles Isabella Calthorpe - Shrek isabella calthorpe. Isabella Anstruther-Gough-
  • Isabella Anstruther-Gough-



  • jnraajan
    01-30 05:13 PM
    It is Question Number 23 now. But, if you sort it by most popular, it is Question No. 48. We need to get more votes to make it a popular question.

    Any chance, the candidates will answer this question





    gene77
    08-11 11:41 AM
    EB3-I, Oct 19 2004.

    God bless us all in EB3.





    cowboy
    07-18 01:55 PM
    thank