mmillo
05-24 07:29 PM
See if it helps:
There is a law of portability. You can change your employer after 180 days from the approval date of your I-140 or 365 days after approval of your labor certificate. In your situation, under the portability law, you do not have to file a new I-140. You should immediately file your I-485/I-765 and attach the approved I-140 notice with your petition. There is no need to mention that the company is closed. This reference would be made only at the time of your interview for Green Card. Filing of New I-140 is out of question. I-140 can only be filed by an employer with an accompanying approved labor Cert. Just file your I-485 petition on June 1.
I talked to the attorney immediately after the sale of the company . He said no need to file any i140 ,
Now after 3 months of his research he found that we have to file a new i140 .
Now i asked him again why, he answered on the safe side and he is wondering if i cann't afford $195
He is probably not aware of this new stuff in senate .i can change employer after filing i-485 only , ( this is my understanding)
My h1(8th year is expiring on aug 30th) he is not even filing h1 ext , he said no need for that , he is confident of getting EAD before aug 30th .
I am wondering my old i-140 may help me or not , Because they are going to pull the file and join with this.
thanks for replying
Marcus
There is a law of portability. You can change your employer after 180 days from the approval date of your I-140 or 365 days after approval of your labor certificate. In your situation, under the portability law, you do not have to file a new I-140. You should immediately file your I-485/I-765 and attach the approved I-140 notice with your petition. There is no need to mention that the company is closed. This reference would be made only at the time of your interview for Green Card. Filing of New I-140 is out of question. I-140 can only be filed by an employer with an accompanying approved labor Cert. Just file your I-485 petition on June 1.
I talked to the attorney immediately after the sale of the company . He said no need to file any i140 ,
Now after 3 months of his research he found that we have to file a new i140 .
Now i asked him again why, he answered on the safe side and he is wondering if i cann't afford $195
He is probably not aware of this new stuff in senate .i can change employer after filing i-485 only , ( this is my understanding)
My h1(8th year is expiring on aug 30th) he is not even filing h1 ext , he said no need for that , he is confident of getting EAD before aug 30th .
I am wondering my old i-140 may help me or not , Because they are going to pull the file and join with this.
thanks for replying
Marcus
wallpaper Rick malambri images
ArunAntonio
12-06 12:22 PM
I would like to add here that I really thank IV Core members for having taken this initiative, It is not easy to take up such a huge cause and try to drive it to completion, just look at the state chapters so few members have signed up and are taking an active part, we are the people who are responsible for making this happen and we should take active part in the efforts to achieve our goals.
Murthy
04-29 07:37 AM
We have an important update on CIR developments.
We have the draft of the upcoming CIR proposal. We are considering releasing it .
Please stay tuned for further updates.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Update
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here is the draft of the Senate proposal. We believe this is still a work in progress-
http://immigrationvoice.org/media/SenateDraftProposal.pdf
Here is our summary of the Senate proposal-
http://immigrationvoice.org/media/DraftProposalSummary.pdf
Dear Pappu
Hats off to IV efforts for EB immigrants.Without a CIR there is no permanentsolution for huge backlog of pending I-485 guys.Every knows it would be difficult to get CIR PASSED to become law.In the past no. of bills introduced never bacame law.Alternatively can IV try for issuance of multi-year say 10-year Employment Authorization Documents (EAD) and 10-year Advance Parole to those I-485 applicants who got pre-adjudicated awaiting visa numbers untill permanent fix.As per USCIS statistics there are about 207,352 (Jan 2010) I-485 applicants who got pre-adjudicated awaiting visa numbers. Hope every one agrees 10-year EAD plus 10-year AP gives big relief to the EB immigration community.
We have the draft of the upcoming CIR proposal. We are considering releasing it .
Please stay tuned for further updates.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Update
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here is the draft of the Senate proposal. We believe this is still a work in progress-
http://immigrationvoice.org/media/SenateDraftProposal.pdf
Here is our summary of the Senate proposal-
http://immigrationvoice.org/media/DraftProposalSummary.pdf
Dear Pappu
Hats off to IV efforts for EB immigrants.Without a CIR there is no permanentsolution for huge backlog of pending I-485 guys.Every knows it would be difficult to get CIR PASSED to become law.In the past no. of bills introduced never bacame law.Alternatively can IV try for issuance of multi-year say 10-year Employment Authorization Documents (EAD) and 10-year Advance Parole to those I-485 applicants who got pre-adjudicated awaiting visa numbers untill permanent fix.As per USCIS statistics there are about 207,352 (Jan 2010) I-485 applicants who got pre-adjudicated awaiting visa numbers. Hope every one agrees 10-year EAD plus 10-year AP gives big relief to the EB immigration community.
2011 Rick Malambri. « Back
prem_goel
11-01 12:10 PM
looks like other people got one too around the same time...must be a USCIS batch job,
more...
rpat1968
09-04 05:22 PM
I got AP and EAD approval in 7 days and got the AP in Mail on 10th day.
prshah102
07-24 10:57 AM
I think those 2 cases may be outliers. Maybe some date are not added in correctly or missing information.
more...
bigboy007
11-01 07:00 PM
Did you speak to level 2 officer to assertain why it was denied.. is that your wifes EAD still pending ? What was your ead status before denial is it pending or CPO ?
I just checked my case status and found that my EAD has been denied!!! This was third time renewal with all clean records, a wait time of more than 90 days, and upon contacting congressman and Ombudsman twice each. I have an infopass appointment on Wednesday (11/03), what should I do?
Could it be a mistake? Any idea what's going on? I'm freaking out! Please help....:eek:
I just checked my case status and found that my EAD has been denied!!! This was third time renewal with all clean records, a wait time of more than 90 days, and upon contacting congressman and Ombudsman twice each. I have an infopass appointment on Wednesday (11/03), what should I do?
Could it be a mistake? Any idea what's going on? I'm freaking out! Please help....:eek:
2010 rick malambri shoes.
ChainReaction
07-26 01:08 PM
You might suggest its BS but i had a 30 min call with her , i explained how the process works etc. then she told me this is the latest rules they have . I want this to be BS too... but after speaking with her and confirming twice i value it atleast to make sure if we can do something. Also she clearly mentioned 4-5 times that NOT ALL APPLICATIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED. there will be many returns . if i hear this thrice how can i say i shouldnt read in to this.
I Don't think that they can return application back, that will be another lawsuit waiting to happen...but i am afraid that they might not process our application until new visa numbers are available again.
I Don't think that they can return application back, that will be another lawsuit waiting to happen...but i am afraid that they might not process our application until new visa numbers are available again.
more...
qplearn
12-12 04:46 PM
You seem to be spending too much time on NumbersUSA website. Maybe you are starting to even like them :D
I don't like them. But if they are suggesting something fair, what is the problem?
I don't like them. But if they are suggesting something fair, what is the problem?
hair rick malambri 2010.
rahulpaper
06-15 06:50 AM
I just got mine done for $160 per person in CT....
Can you please share where. I did send you a PM too
Can you please share where. I did send you a PM too
more...
eb3_nepa
01-31 09:35 AM
cos for the sheer fact you are a temporary legal resident. It might not seem fair to you but that doesnt make it an idiotic response. It goes back to the fairness of temporary legal residents (H1B holders) paying SS and medicare taxes. It goes back to the fairness of not being eligible for unemployment benefits when you lose your job.
I agree for this proposal completely. Why should people both illegal and non working temporary dependents be subsidized by my tax dollars.
Yabadaba with all due respect, the stimulus package is not meant to be a "Subsidy" for ANYONE. It is meant to encourage people to go out and spend that money. Now if a tax paying american citizen can get the rebate for his/her non tax paying spouse and kids, I do not see any reason, why a tax paying legal immigrant should not get the same exact rebate for his/her non tax paying spouse and kids.
Also please understand that dependants who do not pay tax, do so because because the laws do not allow them to work. If you cannot work, you cannot pay taxes, it is that simple. Please refrain from hinting that dependants are "free loaders" because they are not. I speak on behalf of many many legal immigrants whose spouses have not been able to work for more than 2 years and have had to suffer quietly for all this time. For us the July 2nd filing has been more of a blessing than an oasis in a desert. I am not sure if you are married or if you have had your spouse in a similar situation, but if you did, you would know what i mean.
I agree for this proposal completely. Why should people both illegal and non working temporary dependents be subsidized by my tax dollars.
Yabadaba with all due respect, the stimulus package is not meant to be a "Subsidy" for ANYONE. It is meant to encourage people to go out and spend that money. Now if a tax paying american citizen can get the rebate for his/her non tax paying spouse and kids, I do not see any reason, why a tax paying legal immigrant should not get the same exact rebate for his/her non tax paying spouse and kids.
Also please understand that dependants who do not pay tax, do so because because the laws do not allow them to work. If you cannot work, you cannot pay taxes, it is that simple. Please refrain from hinting that dependants are "free loaders" because they are not. I speak on behalf of many many legal immigrants whose spouses have not been able to work for more than 2 years and have had to suffer quietly for all this time. For us the July 2nd filing has been more of a blessing than an oasis in a desert. I am not sure if you are married or if you have had your spouse in a similar situation, but if you did, you would know what i mean.
hot Rick Malambri
singhsa3
07-31 03:05 PM
It is showing something else...
use this link
http://www.c-span.org/Watch/C-SPAN_wm.aspx
and click on Live TV/radio at top :rolleyes:
use this link
http://www.c-span.org/Watch/C-SPAN_wm.aspx
and click on Live TV/radio at top :rolleyes:
more...
house (Rick Malambri Actor R)
walking_dude
11-22 09:16 AM
Thank You.
Others, step forward before we miss the boat. Don't blame IV later if EB visa increase and/or recapture isn't included in the CIR, or the CIR makes your life a hell.(like CIR 2007 tried).
And I vote for a rally
Others, step forward before we miss the boat. Don't blame IV later if EB visa increase and/or recapture isn't included in the CIR, or the CIR makes your life a hell.(like CIR 2007 tried).
And I vote for a rally
tattoo Rick Malambri middot; « Back
priderock
04-27 03:29 PM
Priderock
The attorney Rajeev Khanna explains about the interpretation taken by INS/NSC of bachelor degrees which are of not 4 year duration. NSC takes the stance that one cannot combine degrees/diplomas to be equivalent to a 4-or-more-years bachelor degree. NSC argues that a case to be considered as EB2 with BS+5 years exp, that person should and must have a conslidated one bachelor degree of atleast 4 years. You can listen to the first 15 minutes of the mp3 file of conference call of dated Apr 19 2007. He explains the matter clearly.
The link to download is
http://www.immigration.com/improving_immigration/conference_calls.html
Thanks for the Viswra, I will listen to that.
But most people who talk about 3 year degree rule are talking about an actual 3 year degree program(like BSc/BA/Bcom) in India. My degree is a 4 year degree but allowed to be completed in 3 years because of our advance standing by virtue of completing the diploma in the same fields of Engineering.
It is a regular BE/BTech program in India (if you are familiar with them)
10+3+3 instead of 10+2+4.
The attorney Rajeev Khanna explains about the interpretation taken by INS/NSC of bachelor degrees which are of not 4 year duration. NSC takes the stance that one cannot combine degrees/diplomas to be equivalent to a 4-or-more-years bachelor degree. NSC argues that a case to be considered as EB2 with BS+5 years exp, that person should and must have a conslidated one bachelor degree of atleast 4 years. You can listen to the first 15 minutes of the mp3 file of conference call of dated Apr 19 2007. He explains the matter clearly.
The link to download is
http://www.immigration.com/improving_immigration/conference_calls.html
Thanks for the Viswra, I will listen to that.
But most people who talk about 3 year degree rule are talking about an actual 3 year degree program(like BSc/BA/Bcom) in India. My degree is a 4 year degree but allowed to be completed in 3 years because of our advance standing by virtue of completing the diploma in the same fields of Engineering.
It is a regular BE/BTech program in India (if you are familiar with them)
10+3+3 instead of 10+2+4.
more...
pictures RICK MALAMBRI (Luke) is a
satishku_2000
05-26 03:51 AM
Worst case scenario, senate will pass this bill, the house will pass this bill, the president will sign it and then someone from the USCIS will come by and tell em you're a bunch of jackasses, are you effing kidding me, you people are so goddamned detached from reality, go back to your rooms and come up with a better pile of horseshit than this, your time starts now.
I think we are better off using better words but its my personal opinion. I exactly see what you are saying but secretary chertoff is also one of the architects of this whole mess.
I think we are better off using better words but its my personal opinion. I exactly see what you are saying but secretary chertoff is also one of the architects of this whole mess.
dresses Unwrapped Photos
dontcareanymore
08-23 12:34 AM
Mine got denied last year for these reasons and i have been on EAD since then.
1. Petitioner is not in compliance with the terms and conditions of
employment.
2. Petitioner does not qualify as either an Employer or Agent - Not eligible
to file an H1-B Petition.
3. Petitioner is not an Agent.
4. Petitioner is required to submit a valid LCA for all work locations.
5. Position is not a Speciality Occupation.
Infact it is a 12 page denial letter, these are just bullet points of it.
Although I feel sorry for the people who got their H1s denied, it looks like USCIS is getting tough on these sweatshops. Most of the time, these companies file an LCA for a particular location and place them every where. That is a violation.
Hope they get as tough on these BOGUS EB2 green card petitions as well.
1. Petitioner is not in compliance with the terms and conditions of
employment.
2. Petitioner does not qualify as either an Employer or Agent - Not eligible
to file an H1-B Petition.
3. Petitioner is not an Agent.
4. Petitioner is required to submit a valid LCA for all work locations.
5. Position is not a Speciality Occupation.
Infact it is a 12 page denial letter, these are just bullet points of it.
Although I feel sorry for the people who got their H1s denied, it looks like USCIS is getting tough on these sweatshops. Most of the time, these companies file an LCA for a particular location and place them every where. That is a violation.
Hope they get as tough on these BOGUS EB2 green card petitions as well.
more...
makeup Post a Comment. Rick
Alabaman
09-05 10:24 PM
Landed in the US Winter 2001
Labor: None Yet
Labor: None Yet
girlfriend LEEE777 - 1/11/2010, 10:09 PM
coolpal
03-03 09:23 PM
EWR probably has the worst or most rude IOs... I have known a couple of my friends who met a rude IO and gave them a hard time asking for all sort of docs and still needing some more... I myself had a very bad experience back in Oct 2007, the IO I had to deal with was rude and making sarcastic comments.. he was acting as if I am total idiot and completely at his mercy... He just found a missing zero from my visa stamp compared to my h1b approval notice, and insists I paid someone in Mexico to get my stamp (I went to matamoras for stamping). I took along vacation letters from my employer and the client manager back in 2007, and yet he just seemed to have some problem with me.
I would try my best not to use EWR for international travel again... despite me living and working less than 30 mins from that airpot... I would rather fly from JFK.
pal :)
I would try my best not to use EWR for international travel again... despite me living and working less than 30 mins from that airpot... I would rather fly from JFK.
pal :)
hairstyles Rick Malambri or Henry Cavil!
h1techSlave
09-08 02:02 PM
Only people who came here before 2000 are really desperate.
Wow - what a support group !
Wow - what a support group !
widad2020
09-23 09:55 AM
same here.
Guys,
What is your plan if IV decides to CHEAT all the contributors for FOIA request? I've decided not to participate in any future initiative by IV if I don't see FOIA information.
Guys,
What is your plan if IV decides to CHEAT all the contributors for FOIA request? I've decided not to participate in any future initiative by IV if I don't see FOIA information.
fightnow
07-04 02:34 AM
Hello my friends,
I am from another web tribe (www.mitbbs.com) where people are talking about protest at San Jose this weekend. It is encouraging to know that there are many like-minded here. However, I have some questions about the protest permit and I thank you for sharing your experience on this.
1) Is the permit something that is easy to get given the timing issue? The earliest time to contact the police department is Thursday morning.
2) If we do not get the permit on time, is it legal to protest just on the side walks? I am not sure about the number of participants, but could be up to a thousand.
3) Any other suggestions?
Thanks,
FightNow
I am from another web tribe (www.mitbbs.com) where people are talking about protest at San Jose this weekend. It is encouraging to know that there are many like-minded here. However, I have some questions about the protest permit and I thank you for sharing your experience on this.
1) Is the permit something that is easy to get given the timing issue? The earliest time to contact the police department is Thursday morning.
2) If we do not get the permit on time, is it legal to protest just on the side walks? I am not sure about the number of participants, but could be up to a thousand.
3) Any other suggestions?
Thanks,
FightNow